Hannah Arendt · Politics
Against the long tradition that equates power with force, Arendt argues that power and violence are not the same thing but opposites - power is what arises when people act together, while violence is the instrument of those who have lost it.
In her 1970 essay On Violence, written amid the upheavals of the 1960s - student revolts, anti-colonial wars, a worldwide romance with revolutionary violence - Arendt set out to challenge an assumption so deep that most people had never questioned it: that power and violence are essentially the same thing, that power just is the capacity to make others do what you want by force. From Max Weber’s definition of the state as the monopoly of legitimate violence, to the revolutionary’s faith that power flows from the gun, to ordinary speech in which we slide between ‘power’ and ‘force’ without noticing, the whole tradition treated violence as merely the most concentrated and honest form of power.
Arendt argued that this equation is not just sloppy but dangerous, and that it gets the relationship exactly backwards. Power and violence, she insisted, are not only distinct - they are opposites. They are so different that where one rules absolutely, the other is absent; and the appearance of violence, far from being power at its peak, is usually the sign that real power is draining away. To see this, she said, we must first be clear about what each word actually means - and recover a sense of power that the modern obsession with command and obedience had buried.
If power is what arises when people act together, what is violence? Arendt’s answer is that violence is instrumental: it is distinguished by its reliance on tools - weapons, implements designed to multiply natural strength - and like all instruments it is a means to an end, requiring justification by the end it serves. This makes violence categorically different from power. Power is its own end and needs no justification beyond the legitimacy of the group acting together; it springs from the very act of people coming together. Violence is always a means, always reaching toward some goal outside itself, and always dependent on the implements that make it possible.
This is the opening of the lesson. The rest — the dialogue, the primary source, and the recall — is in the app.
You learned Arendt’s distinction between power (acting in concert, springing up among people) and violence (an instrument, the resort of those losing power). Explain in your own words why she says ‘out of the barrel of a gun grows the most effective command, but never power.’
Leads to Mao Zedong.
Begin this lesson →epoché — a humanities education that remembers you.