bell hooks · Politics
In <em>Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center</em> (1984) and <em>Feminism Is for Everybody</em> (2000), hooks defined feminism not as women becoming equal to men but as a movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation, and oppression - a definition that changes who the movement is for and where its truest view can be found.
hooks believed feminism was perpetually misunderstood because it had never been clearly defined. To some it meant hating men; to others, women wanting to become like men; to others still, a personal lifestyle of independence. Against all of this she offered a definition chosen word by word: feminism is a movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation, and oppression. Look at what that phrasing does. It names the enemy as sexism - a system of thinking and acting - rather than as men, a group of people. It calls feminism a movement, collective political action, not an identity you wear or an attitude you hold. And because sexism can be learned and practiced by anyone, women included, the target is an ideology we have all absorbed, not one sex to be blamed. Get the definition right, hooks argued, and half the confusion and hostility around feminism simply dissolves.
The most common definition of feminism - women achieving social equality with men - looks reasonable until you ask hooks’s deflating question: equal to which men? Poor men, unemployed men, imprisoned men, men brutalized by racism? Most men on earth are not free and powerful; they are themselves dominated by class and race. So ‘equality with men’ secretly smuggles in a comparison to the small group of men who are privileged, and quietly makes their status the prize. A feminism built on that goal ends up asking only that some women be allowed to join the ruling few, leaving the structure of domination untouched and simply adjusting who sits at the top. hooks wanted something more radical: not a fair share of an unjust order, but the end of the ordering itself. The measure of feminism, for her, is not whether women can match powerful men, but whether domination is being dismantled.
hooks argued that feminist theory had been written mostly from the center - by relatively privileged women who could see sexism but not the race and class systems that cushioned them - and that this was why it kept getting the whole picture wrong. Her alternative was to write from the margin. Growing up Black in a small, segregated Kentucky town, on the far side of the tracks that marked the edge of the white world, she had learned early that those at the margin must understand both worlds - the center that excludes them and the edge where they live - while those at the center can afford to know only their own. The margin is a place of deprivation, yes, but also of a doubled, wider vision. To build feminism from there, rather than from the comfortable center, is to build it on the fullest available view of how domination actually works.
This is the opening of the lesson. The rest — the dialogue, the primary source, and the recall — is in the app.
You learned that hooks defined feminism as ‘a movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation, and oppression,’ rejected the ‘equality with men’ definition (equal to which men?), and argued that the clearest view of sexism comes from the margin, not the center. Explain the definition and why its exact wording matters.
Leads to Mary Wollstonecraft.
Begin this lesson →epoché — a humanities education that remembers you.