Gottfried Leibniz · Mathematics
How Leibniz developed the base-two number system - every number written with only 0 and 1 - finding in it a metaphysical image of creation and laying, unknowingly, the arithmetical foundation of the digital age.
We ordinarily count in base ten: ten digits, 0 through 9, and when we run out we start a new column worth ten times as much. The number 237 means two hundreds, three tens, and seven ones - each column ten times the one to its right. There is nothing sacred about ten; we use it because we have ten fingers. Leibniz asked: what if we used the smallest possible base, just two digits, 0 and 1? Then each column would be worth twice the one to its right - ones, twos, fours, eights, sixteens, and so on, the powers of two.
In this binary system, the number we call thirteen is written 1101, meaning one eight, one four, no twos, and one one: 8 + 4 + 0 + 1 = 13. The number five is 101 (one four, no twos, one one). Counting goes 1, 10, 11, 100, 101, 110, 111, 1000 - for one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight. Every whole number, no matter how large, can be written with nothing but zeros and ones. Leibniz worked out the full arithmetic of this system - how to add, subtract, multiply, and divide in base two - and found the rules astonishingly simple, far simpler than the decimal multiplication tables children labour to memorise. To add in binary you need only know that 1 + 1 = 10 (carry the one); to multiply, you only ever multiply by 0 or 1. The whole of arithmetic, reduced to its barest possible elements.
For Leibniz, binary was not merely a calculating convenience; it was charged with metaphysical and even religious meaning. He was struck that every number could be generated from just two symbols - 1 and 0, which he read as something and nothing, being and the void. Here, it seemed to him, was an arithmetical image of the deepest truth of his theology: that God created the entire universe out of nothing, that all of being unfolds from the divine unity (the 1) and the void (the 0). As early as 1697 he had a commemorative medal designed, depicting the creation of the world with the motto that one suffices to draw all things out of nothing - omnibus ex nihilo ducendis sufficit unum.
This fusion of mathematics and metaphysics was entirely characteristic of Leibniz, who saw no sharp boundary between the two. To him the fact that the whole infinite richness of number could be built from being and nothing was not a coincidence but a clue - a sign that the structure of arithmetic reflected the structure of reality, and that the simplest possible mathematics mirrored the simplest possible act of creation. We may find the theology quaint, but we should not miss what is profound in the underlying insight: that maximal richness can be generated from minimal elements, that the entire universe of number requires only a distinction between two states. That insight - everything from a binary distinction - is exactly the principle on which all modern information technology rests, though Leibniz could not have known it. He thought he had glimpsed the arithmetic of God; he had, in fact, also glimpsed the arithmetic of the machine.
One of the strangest and most charming episodes in the history of mathematics is Leibniz’s discovery that his binary system appeared to be encoded in an ancient Chinese text three thousand years old. Leibniz corresponded with Jesuit missionaries in China, and in 1701 one of them, Father Joachim Bouvet, sent him a diagram of the sixty-four hexagrams of the I Ching, the Book of Changes - figures made of six stacked lines, each line either broken or unbroken. Bouvet, knowing of Leibniz’s interest in binary, pointed out the resemblance, and Leibniz was electrified. Reading a broken line as 0 and an unbroken line as 1, the hexagrams, in the traditional arrangement attributed to the legendary sage Fuxi, ran in exact binary order: 000000, 000001, 000010, 000011, and so on, counting from zero to sixty-three.
Leibniz took this as a momentous confirmation. He believed he had recovered the lost meaning of the most ancient Chinese figures - that Fuxi, the mythical founder of Chinese civilisation, had understood binary arithmetic millennia ago, and that the hexagrams were not mystical symbols but a forgotten mathematics. He published his binary paper in 1703 with a title proclaiming that it gave the sense of the ancient Chinese figures of Fuxi. Modern scholars doubt that the ancient Chinese intended binary arithmetic - the traditional ordering Bouvet sent may itself have been arranged late, and the hexagrams were tools of divination, not calculation. But the structural fact is real and remarkable: the sixty-four hexagrams, in that ordering, are the binary numbers from 0 to 63. Whether by design or by the deep logic of any complete system of two-valued six-place patterns, the Book of Changes and Leibniz’s arithmetic meet. It delighted Leibniz, who dreamed always of a universal language of thought, to find his counting hidden in the wisdom of the ancients.
This is the opening of the lesson. The rest — the dialogue, the primary source, and the recall — is in the app.
You learned how Leibniz developed binary arithmetic - representing every number with only 0 and 1 - and why he saw deep significance in it. Explain how binary counting works and why it became the foundation of computing.
Leads to Alan Turing.
Begin this lesson →epoché — a humanities education that remembers you.